What does everyone else think about this?
Reply in this discussion | Not registered?Add a comment
What!? You're not registered?Allowed bbcodes:
[i] - Italized text
[b] - Bolded text
[url=http://example.com]Name[/url] - Creates a hyperlink
[quote=author]Quote[/quote] - Creates a quote box
[del] - Strikethrough
Community activity
Latest forum posts
Have some of you guys (Mods) reset join dates?
Last post: Thrik
Grim Fandango Glottis Cake!
Last post: slipa
LucasArts President Steps Down
Last post: Valkian
Buy UK Monkey Island SE Collection
Last post: Sven_Q45
Rockstar Social Club crew (Lost Souls Alliance)
Last post: Milamputechture
Hosted sites
Mojo Network
Adventure Developers
BrĂ¼tal Legend
Grim Fandango Network
Legend of MI
Razputin's Domain
The SCUMM Bar
Sam & Max.co.uk
Unofficial Sam & Max
World of MI
LFNetwork
IndyJones.net
Force Unleashed.net
JediKnight.net
LucasFiles
LucasForums
RepublicCommando.net
RogueSquadron.net
StarWarsKnights.com
Star Wars MMO.net
SWBattlefront.net
SWGalaxies.net
XWingAlliance.net
Development
Adventure
Monkey Island Wiki
Tales of MI.net
The Dig Museum
The Pumpkin Post
The Thrillville Quarterly
Music
HighLand Productions
iMuse Island
Soundtrack Island
Soundtracks
Game Guides
CMI Guide
Indy Guide
Loom Guide
MI Guide
Misc
Blood Island ElGrande
LucasArts Fiction
Mojo Art
Nightlight Productions
Pacomania

I'm more inclined to believe that the best (and inevitable) move for big companies to benefit from such market changes as Ron and Tim described is to create pretend independent studios that will have a prettier, more attractive offer than what small indie developers can muster - in effect killing most of indie initiatives. The main shift in company practices would be a shift in marketing. And probably would concern only those new branches of products.
Ascovel
I for one hope that big companies won't change their business and marketing models to pretending they are hip, indie developers that want to have relationships with their fans. I've already seen attempts like that. Not everything can have attached a fake human face to, and not seem grotesque.
Ascovel
I for one hope that big companies won't change their business and marketing models to pretending they are hip, indie developers that want to have relationships with their fans. I've already seen attempts like that. Not everything can have attached a fake human face to, and not seem grotesque.
That's not what they should do, they have to realize that people want more things than they offer, and in different ways then they offer it. They raised the subject of DRM, which is old school primitive thinking, no different than the piracy protection techniques used in old floppy disk LucasArts games. The big fishes at the game industry look up to Hollywood as their model to follow, and Hollywood, just like the big record labels, they don't get it. They fear change and make stupid decisions. But it's not hard to understand why, their model worked well for more than half a century (for music). But there is currently more hope for the game industry, in my opinion, than for Hollywood. The video game industry has understood that making games out of movies, superheroes and whatnot, is for the most part, not where the biggest money is. Even though they exploit their successful franchises until there isn't a drop of juice left (and sometimes even past that point), those franchises originated within the industry. Hollywood would rather adapt ANYTHING (books, comics, videogames, anything that was popular for at least a little bit, at some point in time), than to invest in a genuinely good script (which could potentially make a lot of money). So there is more hope for video games, for a start they need to understand and drop stupid practices like DRM.